WITS is the Chemistry Department's Teaching Circle - an informal, monthly, discussion amongst interested faculty, of current issues related to teaching Chemistry.  The WITS program was initiated as a complement to the WINSS (Whats New in Science Seminar) program, which itself was designed to bring interested Chemistry faculty together to discuss current research in the department.  WITS meets on the 2nd Monday of the Month (excepting August, December, and April), over lunch (liquid refreshments provided).  In late Fall 2002, Chemistry Department graduate students interested in possible academic careers expressed interest in creating a WITS-like discussion group focused on their Professional Development needs and concerns.  As part of that program, and if appropriate, at least one WITS per term will be organized around a topic of joint interest to faculty and future faculty, and open to both groups.

Academic Year 2002

Session

Date/Time

Location

Topic

Facilitator


22

 


July 8, 2002
12:00 noon to 1:00pm
 
 Faculty/Staff Lounge, Room 245

Homework:  Expectation vs Reality
Homework?  What Homework
 (Chronicle of Higher Ed, December 6, 2002, p.A35) pdf
If I Quiz Them, They Will Come (Chronicle of Higher Ed, June 21, 2002, p.B5) pdf


The rule of thumb in college is 2 hrs.(minimum) of study for each hour of class.

In college, most learning is done outside of class.  The most important difference between high school and college is that YOU must take primary responsibility for your education.

Consensus:  Those present felt it would be worthwhile for the Undergraduate Curriculum Committee to consider writing a "Recommendation" that everyone would be invited to place on their syllabus.  A starting point might be:  http://www1.umn.edu/usenate/policies/semestercon.html#work


Joe


(10)


21

June 10, 2002
12:00 noon to 1:00pm

Faculty/Staff Lounge, Room 245
Student Laptops
"Chapel Hill Seeks Best Role for Students' Laptops", F. Olsen, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 21 Sep 01, p. A31 (here in pdf format).  There is also an on-line discussion of this paper/topic here.
"Duke U. Decides Against Requiring Freshmen to Own Laptops", F. Olsen, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 11 Jan 02, p. 44 (here in pdf format).  

Ken


(8)


20

 


May 13, 2002
12:00 noon
to
1:00pm

Faculty/Staff Lounge, Room 245
Classroom-Based Games that Promote Active Learning

  Discussion on successfully using classroom games to enliven classroom activities as students struggle with recalling information, using concepts, drawing analogies and increasing critical thinking skills.  Games range from Bingo, to UNO, from Concentration to Wheel-of-Fortune.  

  "Two reasons why games are encouraged in teaching--they are fun (which is motivational to students) and they provide practice for students to use content/knowledge, especially at higher thinking skill levels, and get immediate feedback on their responses. Although not all games give this type of practice--applying, analyzing or synthesizing information--they do (should) provide practice opportunities with immediate feedback, which is crucial for effective learning" (JN, 2/25/02)

See also, the "Sciences Jeopardy Games" web site.
See also, the results of a search on J.Chem.Ed on "games".

Highpoints of the Discussion (in pdf format).


Catherine Palmer
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences

and

Carol Washburn
Senior Instructional Designer, CIDDE


19

 


March 11, 2002
12:00 noon
to
1:00pm

Faculty/Staff Lounge, Room 245
How do we Evaluate the the Success of Our Undergraduate Program?
a discussion on what we might use to decide if our program is as successful as we would like it to be (National Awards won by our undergrads?  a survey of recent BS grads?  Placement after earning the BS degree? National Standardized Exam performance? Etc.)

(DP, 3/14)  Several interesting ideas emerged from our discussions. They included plans for improving the intellectual environment for our majors (junior seminar, spring poster session, etc.); several suggestions for a "capstone" experience, that would improve the appreciation of chemistry in everyday life, and the student's role in it; and the development of an "exit interview sheet", that advisers can use to help us establish a tracking system for our graduates.  Still to be discussed are tools that we might use to help us evaluate the quality of an undergraduate's experience (ACS, oral exams, etc.).


David P.


(19)


18

 

February 11, 2002
12:00 noon
to
1:00pm

Faculty/Staff Lounge, Room 245
Chem for Non-Science Majors
Schultz, Emeric. "A Chemistry Course with a Laboratory for Non-Science Majors" J. Chem. Educ. 2000 77 1001 (a copy is by the photocopier in the front office)

(JJG, 2/11, 2 pm) Consensus from the meeting:  The department should consider creating three Chem 810 courses, with different themes, that serve the same purpose as the current, well-received "Chemistry and Public Policy" (810) course.  Themes discussed included Forensic Chemistry, Pharmaceuticals, Medicinal Chemistry.   The courses could be taught in rotation and should be carefully designed by first identifying the principles that are appropriate for nonscience majors to leave the University with.  The inclusion of a significant to major "lab component" (whether in a real lab or in a lecture hall) should be considered as well as the time of day the courses are offered.


Ericka


(11)


17

 

January 14, 2002
12:00 noon
to
1:00pm

Benedum 621
Integrated Curriculum
The flavor of the discussion will be "How a High Tech Room is Used For Chem 960/970 and theIntegrated Curriculum Project." Len will be prepared to talk for 10 mins or so on how he uses the room and to demonstrate the graphics tablets and other features of the room. Len will ask his colleagues in the IC if they also want to be there to show what they do or to answer questions.

Note:  Since eating and drinking is not permitted in this classroom, we sought and received special permission for liquid refreshments only!


Len





(11 + 7)


16
December 10, 2001
12:00 noon
to
1:00pm

Faculty/Staff Lounge, Room 245
Revision of the GERs
Follow-up to Spring FAS Faculty Meeting of 4/24/01.
{Specific topics of interest to the Chemistry Faculty might include:  Chemistry GER courses.  Educational Outcomes of Chemistry graduates.  Capstone Experience.  Position Paper.}
Report on the Curriculum Review Process, authored by Dean Cooper, April 10, 2001
Notes from the 24 April 01 FAS Faculty Meeting
The following 3 articles appeared in the University Times, 5/3/01:
CAS considers changes in its general education requirements.
Faculty debate proposal to drop 1 natural sciences requirement.
Proposed general education requirements.

  Members of the Curriculum Review Committee as Initially Constructed

David P.

 






(12)


15

 

November 12, 2001
12:00 noon
to
1:00pm

Faculty/Staff Lounge, Room 245
SOW and Chemophobia
SOW = Science Oriented Workshop
"Chemophobia in the College Classroom: Extent, Sources, and Student Characteristics", Roberta M. Eddy, J. Chem. Ed., 2000, 77, 514-517.
(A copy of this paper is on the bulletin board above the copier in CSC-234.)

Eugene


(6) 


14
October 8, 2001
12:00 noon
to
1:00pm

Faculty/Staff Lounge, Room 245

 

What Constitutes a Great Undergraduate Laboratory Experience?
Where do our labs stand with respect to where we dream they might be?
If one searches the JCE Index for "discovery" in the title, 141 hits are returned like this one:
Ciaccio, James A.; Bravo, Roxana P.; Drahus, Antoinette L.; Biggins, John B.; Concepcion, Rosalyn V.; Cabrera, David Diastereoselective Synthesis of (+/-)-1,2-Diphenyl-1,2-propanediol. A Discovery-Based Grignard Reaction Suitable for a Large Organic Lab Course J. Chem. Educ. 2001 78 531. (April 2001).

Scott's Transparency/document (in MS-Word format).
Highpoints of the Discussion (in MS-Word format).

Scott

 


(14)


13
September 10, 2001
12:00 noon
to
1:00pm

Faculty/Staff Lounge, Room 245

 

Discussions about Scholarly Publishing Today, continued
The Latest Info on the Public Library of Science project.
To prepare, first answer:  What is Chemistry's goal for library "services" realizing that infinite space and infinite budgets are not realistic?
Next:  Readings suggested by Rush Miller:
Create:  New System of Scholarly Communication.
and Principles for Emerging Systems of Scholarly Publishing.
Other Readings:  Drowning in a Sea of Refereed Publications (C&E News, 1/29/01, p. 37) and Life Scientists Circulate Publishing Manifesto (C&E News, 12/18/00, p. 7).
Lots more information available here:  Current Issues In Scholarly Publication (a web site maintained by Pitt's ULS)

Rush Miller
University Librarian
and
Director, University Library System (ULS)

 

 


(13)

 

 

Page Created & Maintained by:  Joe Grabowski

Last Updated:  12/24/03